Antique Gique

Networking => Networking => Topic started by: Bill on March 31, 2012, 07:53:12 am

Title: Subnet masks
Post by: Bill on March 31, 2012, 07:53:12 am
Stumbled accross this on another forum and thought I'd make a stab at answering it. Keep in mind that I'm no teacher, so what makes sense to me, may not help another. I've added a link below to additional help.

Quote from: artemis090
Ok, we have an IP address of which we know is a "B" class (

But the subnet mask given was

How did they get the .252??

Another example..... (Which is a "C" class,

Yet the subnet given is

How did they arrive at the .224?

Is this a matter of subnetting, or is this a CIDR issue.

Keep in mind that the subnet mask defines the network by defining, or segregating the network bits in an address from the host bits.

Class B subnet mask begins at 255.255 0.0. As you move down the heirarchy of subnets, the mask will further define lower level networks. The highest level Class B networks will use as a subnet mask. - Top level Class B Network = 11111111.11111111.00000000.00000000 - Second level subnet = 11111111.11111111.10000000.00000000 Third level subnet = 11111111.11111111.11000000.00000000 - Fourth level  subnet = 11111111.11111111.11100000.00000000 - Fifth level  subnet = 11111111.11111111.11110000.00000000 - Sixth level subnet = 11111111.11111111.11111000.00000000 - Seventh level subnet = 11111111.11111111.11111100.00000000 - Eighth level subnet = 11111111.11111111.11111110.00000000

These are all Class B subnet masks. - Top level Class C network = 11111111.11111111.11111111.00000000 - Second level subnet = 11111111.11111111.11111111.10000000

And so on for Class C.

Learn to Subnet (
Title: Re: Subnet masks
Post by: Transk53 on April 14, 2012, 02:33:39 am
Nice post there. Subnetting can look quite daunting sometimes, I used a Warehouse metaphor when I came accross it, rather than look entirely at the numbers.
Title: Re: Subnet masks
Post by: Bill on April 14, 2012, 07:19:53 am
I think the original poster had it set in their mind that Class B subnets could only be and Class C could only be I'm not sure if I really clarified anything or not.
Title: Re: Subnet masks
Post by: Transk53 on April 14, 2012, 01:37:24 pm
Yeah. Must admit that when I first read up on subnets, I did think that the address ranges were confined to that particular IP range. Not that I have dealt with Class B ranges though, but your seems clear to me.